Transitioning to Uncased Blends

Posted on June 2, 2008
Filed Under Help Wanted |

It seems our “Help Wanted” section is becoming quite popular. Roswell writes in to ask about moving from aromatics to non-cased blends. What advice do you have for him?

Been smoking aromatic blends for approx 3 years, with increasing frequency (one or two times per day for 4-5 days per week over the past 6-8 months). Mostly C&D’s Autumn Evening and McClelland’s Townsman Cavendish Blue. I want to expand my horizons into non-cased blends and have just tried Dunhill’s Early Morning Pipe. OK, but interested in what others you’d recommend as potential transitioning blends for me…

In my opinion, burley based blends make excellent transition smokes. Try something like Barbary Coast. While being technically a cased blend (Brandy), it will open your eyes to a wider range of tobacco flavors before you go jumping headlong into the rest.

Comments

RSS feed | Trackback URI

13 Comments »

Comment by Steve (butman
2008-06-02 08:59:06

Dunhill EMP is an excellent blend, but there some other blends that would be all day types. Here are some I recommend and some have burley in them-Grey Havens (McClelland) Haunted Bookshop (C&D), Sam Gawith Lakeland #6, GL Pease Stratford, no burley, but subtle and delicious and for pure burley flavor try Five Brothers go slow it burns fast.

Good luck

Comment by Mike Herbert
2008-06-02 20:28:53

Thanks Steve I’ll give them a try soon..

Mike Herbert aka “Roswell 49″

 
 
Comment by Jim Austin
2008-06-02 11:08:49

I haven’t smoked EMP for months, but when I tried it last–at a time when I had been smoking mostly aromatics–I tasted nothing but pepper (more a tongue-feel than a taste) and ash. Didn’t like it at all.

So I guess the main thing I would suggest is trying some different non-aromatics. Among Virginias, Hal O The Wind is nice. Right now I REALLY like Frog Morton–the original. I’m not sure it qualifies as uncased, but even if it’s not it should be a good bridge. There’s a smell to FM that I just love, and it isn’t a sweet smell like the typical aromatic.

Partly it’s about how you think about it. Aromatics are dessert. To me, a good English, and perhaps Virginia–the type I like–is like barbecue.

Jim

Comment by MikeHerbert
2008-06-02 20:27:07

Thanks Jim. I’ll give Frog Morton a try soon..

Mike Herbert aka “Roswell 49″

 
 
Comment by Pseudo Nim
2008-06-02 12:04:31

I too am a convert from aromatics and had I asked the same question, I would have liked someone to answer in the following way (only because I find this suits me): try first Sam Gawiths Best Brown Flake, if you want something a little stronger, or should I say with a little more flavour, then Gawith and Hogarth’s Best Brown No2 should fit the bill quite nicely and if your still not satisfied, then back to Sam Gawith for a Full Virginia Flake. All three are very fine quality tobaccos and amongst them I hope you will find at least one that will give you a good “smoking base” with which to experiment further.

Tony M.

Comment by RickPiatt
2008-06-07 17:04:04

Got to agree with Tony M’s comments - in fact it was exactly what I was thinking when I first saw this cry for help. When I transitioned from aromatics to uncased tobaccos it was a fairly rocky road for me. Just when I was about to give up thinking all tinned tobaccos were just bland flavorless things I stumbled upon SG’s Best Brown Flake and viola! The magic happened. Later I found G&H Best Brown #2 and again that same magic happened. They’re two completely different blends, don’t fear. But they’re both excellent, smooth as silk, and just (naturally) sweet enough to hold your interest. Good luck

 
 
Comment by Johnny O.
2008-06-02 12:11:30

When I switched to non-aromatics I went for the sweet virginia blends such as the Stokkebye Luxury blends, Orlik Golden Sliced, Bjarne Flake De Luxe, etc. You may also want to try a light english such as Presbyterian mixture or Squadron Leader. Bob’s Chocolate Flake has a dash of latakia and is a nice blend. C&D makes some new virginia blends with a kiss of honey, I believe they were part of the Simply Elegant series, you may want to try some of those as well.

 
Comment by Mike Herbert
2008-06-02 20:29:42

Thanks to all for the advice!!!

Mike Herbert aka “Roswell 49″

 
Comment by Stacey Jones
2008-06-03 11:10:46

Well, I think you mean non-aromatic, since I’ve heard all blends have some type of casing and I don’t doubt it but here are my picks so far on the basic types:

Pure Virginia -> Samuel Gawith’s Full Virginia Flake
Virginia/Perique -> McClelland’s 2015
Balkan -> Gawith & Hoggarth’s Balkan
English -> Solani’s 779 Gold Label “English Luxury Mixture”
Latakia Blend -> Esoterica’s Penzance

Ask me again in a year and my picks might change a bit. ;)

Happy smoking!

 
Comment by Steerpike
2008-06-03 12:03:11

I started with aromatics, and tried some pale virginia flakes as my first of the more natural blends. But it was the strong English mixtures, with plenty of latakia, that really opened my eyes. SO much more enjoyable than what I was used to, so much more flavour. Don’t be afraid because they are stronger, just use a smaller pipe the first time, and preferably one that doesn’t have cherry vanilla oozing from its pores. I suggest Dunhill Standard Mixture as a good start. Dont go for the super light Englishes to start with, start in the middle. 965 is also a good start, or Murrays “Oriental”.
For me the pure virginias, and even the lighter Englishes only became really enjoyable when I’d got good at “breath smoking”, and could smoke them REALLY slowly. Until you get the hang of that, the richer tobaccos offer the best flavour and the least tongue bite.

 
Comment by Brent Swails
2008-06-03 13:19:21

I recently transitioned from aromatic blends. So far I am really enjoying the Frog Morton series. I still haven’t acquired a taste for Bob’s Chocolate Flake but I have some that has aged for a few months that I intend to rub out more than before and try in my meerschaum.

I also plan to try some of the Virgina blends and plan on buying some McClelland 2015 soon.

 
Comment by Captain Bob
2008-06-09 23:39:02

I buy uncased tobacco’s from C&D. Then, I flavor them with professional aromatic sauces. I use a non-latakia blend as well as a latakia blend for this purpose. I have learned that C&D tobacco’s are generally drier than most as they use nothing but distilled water prior to adding flavors. They have aromatic as well as non-aromatic blends. Keep in mind “all” tobacco’s have some flavoring added. It is merely a question of “degree” which classifies them as non-aromatics vs. aromatics. I suggest you try a non-latakia, non-aromatic blend from C&D. http://www.cornellanddiehl.com Consider “Two Friends Heritage”. It happens to be the only tobacco the owner, Craig Tarler smokes! It is a fine way to transition to non-aromatics as it has only a tiny bit of flavoring but good natural tobacco taste. No spicy latakia in this blend.

 
Comment by Alan
2008-06-13 10:31:40

I can’t offer anything that hasn’t already been suggested, but would like to voice another vote for the original Frog Morton. I was on aromatics, and the smell of FM worried me at first; I liked it, but the smokiness made me think it might be too harsh. Not at all so. In fact, it’s hard to get this blend to bite.

I then moved on to Butera’s Royal Vintage Latakia No. 2, which I liked (and still like) even more. To me, No. 2 is pretty sweet (but less so than FM), and not too smokey, while No. 1 is just the opposite. I really like mixing No. 1 and No. 2 50/50 to get the balance I want.

Hope this helps!

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post