Duplicates & Missing Pictures

Snug Harbor under C&D has a dupe. The Blog is great!

http://tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=S&TID=2731

http://tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=S&TID=2731

Revelation by House of Windsor is duplicated…

Been a very, very long time user of this site and it just gets better and better! Kudos!

Links for Revelation tobacco:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=R&TID=1219

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=R&TID=1994

Some more…

Middletons Black & Mild:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=M&TID=2475

is a duplicate of

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=B&TID=1741

Middletons Wine Berry

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=W&TID=2644

is a duplicate of

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=W&TID=2645

Carolina Rose:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=C&TID=1091

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=C&TID=2146

Springwater:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=S&TID=1247

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=S&TID=1248

Captain Black Blue/Light?

I believe these may be duplicates:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=C&TID=648

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=C&TID=1779

Coco-Creme:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=C&TID=654

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=C&TID=2328

Another Coco-Creme dupe as above:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=3&TID=1625

Black Spice??

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=B&TID=641

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=B&TID=228

Surely the same tobacco, but apparently sold under a different brand name? Is this sort of thing a duplicate?

Same scenario again:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=V&TID=690

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=D&TID=243

A more obvious one!

Dan Tobacco, Sweet Vanilla Honeydew

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=S&TID=1506

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=S&TID=416

Mick McQuaid Flake/Square Cut Flake:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=M&TID=1178

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=M&TID=1177

Peter Stokkebye Virginia Q:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=V&TID=2548

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=V&TID=2547

Country Doctor:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=C&TID=1104

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=C&TID=1995

Dutch Masters Cherry Cavendish:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=D&TID=2629

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=D&TID=2624

Cornell & Diehl Plum Duff:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=0&TID=314

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=5&TID=2901

Germain’s Plum Cake:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=G&TID=1145

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=P&TID=1664

These are definitely the same tobacco despite differing tin descriptions!

There are actually three listings for Cornell & Diehl Snug Harbor, as follows:

http://tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=9&TID=2902

http://tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=S&TID=2765

http://tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=S&TID=2731

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=H&TID=1149

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=H&TID=1150

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=H&TID=1151

Borkum Riff Whiskey/Bourbon Whiskey

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=B&TID=2888

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=W&TID=1082

One and the same tobacco as far as I am aware - it is only the Highland Malt Whiskey (link below) that requires a separate page:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=H&TID=2889

See this link…

http://www.borkumriff.com/

for further details

McCranie’s Red Flake:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=R&TID=809

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=R&TID=1703

These are the same tobaccos:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=L&TID=2679

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=B&TID=2704 (correct name).

+JMJ+

Blakenew’s Best Latakia Flake (http://tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=B&TID=2540)

Is also listed (incorrectly) as Latakia Flake (http://tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=L&TID=2484)

also, Bayou Slice (http://tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=B&TID=2483) should probably be listed as Blakeney’s Best Bayou Slice.

also, is there any such animal as Blackwoods Extra Flake? (http://tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=B&TID=1562)

In reference to pictures of tins: I would just like to comment that a picture of the tobacco itself, along with the tin would be nice. I’m thinking along the lines of smokingpipes’ bulks pictures with the possible addition of the tin sitting in there, too. (I don’t mean go steal their pictures, but to make similar ones).
thanks,
-loose

Two years ago it was decided in the EU that tobacco products are to carry larger warning texts. In that same law it also says that words like “Light “and “Mild” cannot be used on tobacco products anymore.( see Mac Baren site http://www.mac-baren.com/BundMenu/Products/Change-of-names.aspx )
As a result, these are the name changes for Mac Baren :

Mixture Light(Old Name) = Mixture Aromatic (New name)
http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=M&TID=705
http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=M&TID=2205

Mixture Mild (Old Name) = Mixture Modern (New name)
http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=M&TID=1582
http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=M&TID=2204

+JMJ+

Mixture 79:

http://tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=M&TID=2530

http://tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=M&TID=1183

Also, the second listing is listed under “H. Sutliff”, instead of “Sutliffe Tobacco Company”, and is the only listing under that brand.

Thanks everyone, and keep it up! I have not yet removed all of the duplicates, but I am working on it.

Hey, Jon!

Keep up the great work! This site has really changed my smoking life over the last three years with no end is sight! Love it.

In reference to the pictures, is there a size (in pixels) that works the best? Some of the pictures I’ve seen are quite distorted and if I sent one in, I’d like for that not to happen. If there was an ideal size, I could adjust to that as I deal with the picture.

Also, are jpegs the format that you want them in?

Perhaps the answer to both of these questions are obvious to those whose computer skills are more up to date than the 1990s!!!

Thanks,
Doug Pearson

jpegs are excellent, though gifs are fine too.

As to the size, larger is better than small, so send ‘em in big.

I am working on integrating a better photo system that will automatically make thumbnails the size I want to display and allow you to click on the thumbnail for a full size picture.

The distorted ones on the site now are pics that are too small, and I hope to replace them eventually.

I sent 3 jpegs yesterday,did you receive them ?

Question- Is there a discussion forum linked to tobacco reviews?

Regards Kenneth- Yorkshire UK

Black Cordial has two listings, one Consolidated and the other Lane. I am under the impression that Altadis manufacture this blend.

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=Z&TID=1621

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=B&TID=639

Consolidated Black Cherry:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=3&TID=1620

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=N&TID=238

Exclusiv Black Cherry:

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=B&TID=2228

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend_detail.cfm?ALPHA=B&TID=2244

I’d like to see a section that rate tobacconists - be it on the high steet and online. I’ve had dealings with a number of online tobacco sales and have had service from excellent to so so. Also some seem to be better stocked than others.